Blog

On 30 March 2026, the Minister of Employment and Labour published a notice in the Government Gazette extending the National Bargaining Council for the Road Freight and Logistics Industry (NBCRFLI) Main Collective Amending Agreement to non-parties. In terms of section 32 of the Labour Relations Act, this extension has the effect of making the amended collective agreement binding on all employers and employees operating within the defined scope of the industry, whether or not they are members of the bargaining council or signatory organisations.

The agreement takes effect from the second Monday after publication of the notice and remains in force until 28 February 2027. For employers in the road freight and logistics sector, this is a development with immediate and far‑reaching implications, particularly in relation to leave entitlements and administrative compliance.

Binding effect on non‑party employers

The extension notice confirms that all employers engaged in the transportation and ancillary storage of goods for hire or reward fall within the scope of the agreement, subject to the exclusions already recognised in the industry, such as enterprises regulated by the Transnet Bargaining Council and the Motor Ferry Industry Bargaining Council. Importantly, the application of the agreement is not limited to traditional transport operations. It also expressly includes temporary employment services supplying labour for work that ordinarily falls within the road freight and logistics industry.

For non‑party employers, the legal consequence is clear: the amended provisions of the Main Collective Agreement now apply automatically and by operation of law. Employers cannot contract out of these obligations, nor rely on internal policies that are inconsistent with the agreement. Failure to comply exposes employers to enforcement action by the bargaining council and potential statutory penalties.

Expanded and consolidated parental leave regime

The most significant substantive change introduced by the amending agreement concerns leave, particularly the replacement of traditional maternity, paternity, and adoption leave provisions with a comprehensive parental leave framework.

Clause 23 has been substituted in its entirety and now establishes parental leave as a universal entitlement, regardless of gender, biological status, or family structure. Every employee, in the event of the birth, adoption, or commissioning of a child, is entitled to parental leave. Where both parents are employed, they share an aggregate entitlement of four months and ten days, which may be taken concurrently or consecutively, subject to agreement.

For employers, this represents a decisive shift away from gender‑based leave distinctions. The agreement places a clear duty on employers to manage parental leave requests consistently and without discrimination. It also expressly prohibits employers from refusing, obstructing, or penalising employees for taking or sharing parental leave. These safeguards raise the compliance threshold and will require careful alignment with HR practices and supervisory training.

The agreement further confirms that birth mothers retain statutory protection against working four weeks before and six weeks after the birth of a child, unless medically certified as fit for work. In addition, employees who experience a miscarriage during the third trimester or a stillbirth are entitled to six weeks’ parental leave. These provisions underscore the need for employers to approach leave administration with sensitivity and legal precision.

Paid maternity component and UIF interaction

Although parental leave is largely unpaid, the agreement retains a limited paid maternity benefit for a specified class of employees. Birth mothers who have completed at least six months’ uninterrupted service and who fall within categories for which minimum wages are prescribed are entitled to payment of 33% of their normal basic wage during maternity leave. This payment must be made weekly by the employer.

This obligation has direct cost implications for affected employers and requires payroll systems to distinguish between employees who qualify for this benefit and those who do not. Employers must also accommodate employees’ entitlement to claim parental benefits from the Unemployment Insurance Fund, recognising that UIF payments do not negate the employer’s limited payment obligations under the agreement.

Notice requirements and operational planning

The amended agreement introduces detailed notice requirements for employees intending to take parental leave. Employees must notify employers in writing at least one month in advance, where reasonably practicable, indicating the intended start date, duration, and return‑to‑work date. While this assists employers with workforce planning, the agreement also recognises that advance notice may not always be possible, particularly in cases such as premature birth or emergency placements.

Employers will need to ensure that line managers are familiar with these requirements and that operational planning accounts for the possibility of staggered or concurrent parental leave, especially in workplaces with limited operational redundancy.

Administrative and governance amendments

Beyond leave, the amending agreement also introduces changes aimed at improving financial oversight within the bargaining council and associated funds. The provisions relating to the auditing of the council’s books and the Wellness Fund have been refined, with clearer reporting and inspection obligations.

While these amendments are primarily directed at the council’s governance structures, employers should note that continued compliance with council levies and fund contributions remains critical. The strengthened auditing framework reinforces accountability and may indirectly result in more rigorous enforcement of employer obligations.

Duration and compliance imperative

The agreement applies until 28 February 2027, and its extension to non‑parties leaves little room for delay or uncertainty. Employers who have not traditionally fallen within the bargaining council environment, or who have relied on internal policies aligned only to the Basic Conditions of Employment Act, must now ensure that their policies, contracts, and practices are aligned with the industry agreement.

In practical terms, this means reviewing leave policies, updating payroll systems, training HR personnel, and ensuring that management understands the increased protections afforded to employees. Given the breadth of the agreement’s application, even smaller operators and owner‑drivers may be affected, particularly in relation to hours of work and registration obligations.

Conclusion

The extension of the NBCRFLI Main Collective Amending Agreement marks a significant regulatory development for the road freight and logistics industry. Its most notable impact lies in the modernisation and expansion of parental leave rights, reflecting broader shifts in labour regulation toward inclusivity and equality.

For employers, the message is unequivocal: compliance is no longer optional or limited to bargaining council members. Proactive alignment with the amended agreement is essential to mitigate legal risk, manage operational disruption, and ensure fair and lawful employment practices across the industry.

Read the NBCRFLI Extension to Non-Parties of the Main Collective Amending Agreement 2026 – 2027 Here.